Opinion 
 Blogs 
 National Comment 
 Men's murderous revenge 

Men's murderous revenge

Since Arthur Freeman was found guilty of murdering his four-year-old daughter, Darcey, much of the media focus has been on the distress of fathers going through separation and custody disputes. There has been a call for more support for fathers.

However, we must ask ourselves whether we are losing sight of the victims and, more importantly, whether this is the best approach to preventing these deaths from occurring in the future.

While the community understandably struggles to comprehend a parent killing a child, our research shows that these are not inexplicable tragedies. There is a particular type of filicide (the killing of children by parents) that occurs in the context of the separation of the parents.

In these ''spousal revenge'' cases - as recognised by the Freeman jury - fathers kill their children to punish their ex-partners. There is usually no prior violence against the children. In fact, they appear to love their children. The act of killing is directed towards harming the child's mother. The motive is revenge.

In the case of Freeman and Robert Farquharson (found guilty of three counts of murder of his sons Bailey, Tyler and Jai, aged two to 10, who drowned in a dam near Winchelsea), both fathers indicated that they wished to punish their ex-partner. Shortly before killing Darcey, Freeman told his ex-wife to say goodbye to her children and that she would never see them again - clearly to make her suffer. Farquharson told a friend that he would make his ex-wife suffer by taking what mattered to her most - her children.

Contrary to some claims, these cases are not about fathers losing access to their children. The reality is that in both cases, the fathers had access to their children and, in both cases, killed them during it.

There is no logic to the thinking that if a person is distressed about not spending enough time with their kids they would decide to kill them.

If, however, they are consumed with anger and hatred towards their ex-partner and wish to hurt them, then it is, tragically, a very effective means to do so.

The killing of the children in such cases should be recognised as a form of violence against the mother. We need to explore the relationship between the parents in order to understand the killing of children. In particular, the father's attitudes and behaviour towards the mother before, and after, separation must be examined. VicHealth has clearly identified the underlying causes of violence against women as including belief in rigid gender roles and a masculine sense of entitlement.

What we really need to challenge is the sense of entitlement that some men have over their families, an entitlement that leads them to believe that their partner has no right to leave them and no right to form a new relationship, and that punishing her is justified because of the suffering they themselves experience.

The current focus of commentary suggests that men are victims of the family law system. The mothers seem to be implicitly blamed for the distress their partners experienced when they left them.

Let's be clear: the first and foremost victims here are the children whose lives are taken. The mothers, whose children have died in perhaps the worst way imaginable, are also the victims, as are remaining siblings and other family members. Darcey Freeman's mother, Peta Barnes, had expressed concerns about the safety of her children before Darcey's death. She also expressed concerns about Arthur Freeman's ''anger management issues'' and mood swings. It is important that such concerns are heard and responded to appropriately by a broad range of professionals coming into contact with separating parents, as well as by family and friends.

The family law process must make children's safety its absolute priority. Importantly, the federal government has a family law bill before Parliament that prioritises the safety of children in family law matters.

The Domestic Violence Resource Centre Victoria acknowledges that separation and family breakdown can be incredibly difficult for parents. Parents should be assisted to deal with separation and encouraged to take responsibility for their behaviour. As a community, we need to focus on building positive and respectful relationships.

We support the call for greater services and support. We ask that these services be equipped to identify and respond to risks to the safety and wellbeing of children and their parents. We need to ensure there is accurate and reliable screening and risk assessment for all forms of family violence. These cases demonstrate that the risk of harm to children is closely linked to risks of harm to the mother.

Cases such as Freeman's have a profound impact on the community and we are right to search for answers. Unfortunately, there has been very little research on parents who kill their children in the past decade in Australia. If we are to find ways to prevent these deaths, we need a far better understanding of why and how they occur.

Dr Debbie Kirkwood is a researcher at the Domestic Violence Resource Centre Victoria and is writing a paper on filicide in the context of parental separation.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1




comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
What about mothers who do the same? As a father of children from a separated marriage i have to continually watch my children suffer whilst thier mother uses them as pawns to hurt me for leaving her. Whilst she does not go to extents of murder or to an extreme where i can actually report her she still makes my children suffer as a consequence of me leaving her. This is not a one gender topic.
Posted by cactus, 31/03/2011 12:25:08 PM
So true Debbie, I couldn't understand why the jury were having so much trouble making a decision and it's all about control.
Posted by LOU, 31/03/2011 12:36:55 PM
I have never been through this system but have observed it closely for friends and relatives. And am bound to conclude that it is the law itself that is at fault.

You fail to point out that the cause of the revenge is the fact that the mother is usually the beneficiary of a seriously biased system. If the system had not been handed to the feminazis the serious sense of injustice would not pervade the outcomes.

In this case the whole family are victims of an unjust process in a seriously flawed system.

Apprehended Violence Orders stopped being an instrument of protection long ago and have since evolved into a key tool for the predatory acquisition of property.

The family law framework allows vexatious claims, defamatory material, fraudulent misrepresentation and benefit by deception with impunity. These activities are crimes in every other legal circumstance but are excused in family law. And in light of these double standards it is surprising that seriously violent responses are so rare.

Is there any greater form of self harm than murdering one's own children?

Posted by Ian Mott, 31/03/2011 12:44:34 PM
This is a very tragic case and I can't believe anyone can be in their right mind to do such a horrid thing. However this article focuses only on men as the ones capable of such an act. If the roles were reversed could a woman also be capable of such a terrible thing as an act of revenge on their ex-partner? I am a non-custodial father who is going through the court for a second time trying to get access to my daughter. The mother of my child has done everything she is capable of doing to prevent me from having a relationship with my daughter - this includes allegations of sexual abuse and violence. There are no logical reasons I can think of for her doing this apart from she is trying to get back at me for leaving her. God forbid if she ever try anything to harm our child as retaliation if court doesn't go in her favour.

Aeneas McBurney

Concerned Father

Posted by Aeneas, 31/03/2011 1:57:46 PM
There is no excuse for the killing of inncocent children, your own or otherwise. However these sorts of crimes are just as easy perpetrated by the mother as well as the father.

When its the mother commiting the act , its always about ' poor victim mother driven to killing her children, saw it as the only way out' When its the father suddenly its 'murderous father takes reveng on mother'

Dont forget that every separated man is either a murderor or a paedo!.


Posted by Ian, 31/03/2011 2:23:30 PM
There can never be any excuse for anyone deliberately harming/murdering innocent children, like this animal did. Like others I cannot understand why it took so long for this animal to be found guilty. But what worries me more is why if he wanted to kill one of his children did he chose the girl out of the three. Is there some gender bias in this as well? And as for the legal profession, again they demonstrated that ‘in the best interests’ of their client they have no morals at all. The spurious arguments thrown at the jury to create confusion by the rent-a-psychologist, is appalling.
Posted by Lara, 31/03/2011 4:03:46 PM
"You fail to point out that the cause of the revenge is the fact that the mother is usually the beneficiary of a seriously biased system. If the system had not been handed to the feminazis the serious sense of injustice would not pervade the outcomes"

Ian Mott, prefacing an argument with "the fact that" will not turn it into one. And as soon as you drop those old chestnuts about "feminazis" you lost any crediblity.

I am not saying all mothers are angels but it seems that, whenever there is a wee pendulum swing that tips towards women, it is howled as some kind of "injustice".

There is no "self harm" in murdering one's own children; it is downright selfish and spiteful. If Freeman was frustrated and upset, he should have taken himself out. not an innocent child who trusted him. There is no excuse for his behaviour yet whenever a father murders his own children there's always the usual, predictable cabal of males -- and some women (usually second wives) -- who proclaim that child-murder, hello *child-murder*, is the inevitable result when some bloke was angry that a woman was permitted to usurp his rightful male authority. How utterly shameful.

Posted by Othello Cat, 31/03/2011 10:05:57 PM
Or both Ian.

Just thought I'd better add the women are never out there abusing the system or playing mind games at all....

Posted by Shane, 1/04/2011 9:50:51 AM
What a frustratingly sexist take on a tragic issue.
Posted by morrgo, 1/04/2011 9:59:12 AM
NOT impressed Ms.Kirkwood , Your attempt to hitch the feminist bandwagon to the murder of this little girl is particularly distasteful . You`ve completely missed what what Australians find so abhorent about this crime and that is it is diametrically opposed to way almost all fathers feel about their "little (regardless of their age or size) girls"
Posted by Waylander, 1/04/2011 5:12:34 PM
1 | 2  |  next >
National Comment
Here is the place for you to vent on any national or world news and lifestyle stories on the YourGuide websites. If there is anything you see or hear that you like or don't like, tell us. Don't keep it to yourself!
Related Coverage
BLOGS
29 March, 2011

Most popular articles




Harden-Murrumburrah Express







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...