Opinion 
 Blogs 
 National Comment 
 Food for thought while millions die of hunger 

Food for thought while millions die of hunger

The world is rapidly moving towards disaster, whether you call it doomsday or apocalypse. But this is not the global financial crisis or the risk of financial problems in Greece and other European countries that may drag the rest of the world down with them. No, this is the global food situation. We face a global food shortage, the like of which the world has never seen.

How do I know that? I have read books, articles and blogs that tell me so. They bear titles such as Agricultural Apocalypse 2010, The End of Food, Food Wars, Fearing Food and In Defence of Food. They, and many others, try to bring back to life Thomas Malthus, the philosopher who more than 200 years ago said the world's population would increase faster than food supply, thus resulting in mass starvation.

One could argue that these publications are written by authors aware that exaggeration and sensationalism get people's attention. Books predicting the end of the world is nigh do sell. But even serious scientists and international organisations are talking about the ''perfect storm'' of global food shortages.

When global food prices increased rapidly during 2007 and the beginning of 2008, the United Nations Food and Agricultural Organisation reported large increases in the number of undernourished people. Its estimates of 100 million to 170 million additional hungry people were quoted by newspapers worldwide. Its admission that these estimates were rough and subject to large errors was lost in the frenzy to quote them.

When food prices fell dramatically during the last half of 2008, one might have expected a fall in the number of undernourished people. That did not seem to happen. At least it was not reported. Good news does not seem to be newsworthy.

Is the world really headed towards a global food apocalypse? No, not really.

Large groups of people do not have access to sufficient food to meet their needs. Hunger and malnutrition contribute to the deaths of about 5 million preschool children a year. For them, the apocalypse is real. Many more survive but suffer from malnutrition and associated poverty and poor health.

But there is plenty of underused productive capacity to feed the present, and expected future, global population. The key questions are whether the natural resources that make up this capacity will be managed sustainably, whether food prices are high enough to cover the costs of expanding food production, whether the millions of poor people will get access to enough food and whether governments and international organisations will prioritise sustainable food production for all.

More than two-thirds of African farmers are net buyers of food; they cannot produce enough food to meet their needs. Not because they are lazy and the productive capacity is absent, but because they do not have access to credit, fertilisers and high-yielding seeds that are resistant to insects and are drought-tolerant. They do not have access to markets where they can sell their products at prices that cover production costs. Their crop yields could be doubled or tripled. It has been done in places where these problems have been solved.

Poor farmers damage the environment. They mine their soils for plant nutrients because they cannot get access to reasonably priced fertilisers. For them, feeding their families now is more important than protecting the land for the future. Poor farmers expand agricultural production into lands unsuited for agriculture and at high risk of degradation because they cannot increase yields on the better land.

But these problems can be solved with enlightened policies and investments. The necessary interventions will vary among countries and places, but two are likely to be very important in most settings: improved rural infrastructure (roads, irrigation facilities, institutions) and agricultural research to expand yields, reduce unit costs of production and assure sustainable use of natural resources.

Triple wins, such as reduced soil degradation, increased food production and an escape from poverty, are waiting to be realised. Access to fertilisers will reduce soil mining, increase yields and help poor farmers out of poverty - but only if the farmer has access to credit, and the infrastructure gives him access to markets without excessive transactions costs.

Without efforts to expand food production in a sustainable manner, the doomsday prophets will be right. Many more millions of children will die, natural resources will be destroyed and the world will face real food shortages.

Will policy makers respond in time? The global food crisis that gave ammunition to the predictors of a food apocalypse was a warning of what may happen when the food sector is ignored by policy makers. Unwarranted complacency is the doomsday prophet's best friend.

This is an edited extract of the Sydney Ideas address on Thursday by Per Pinstrup-Andersen, professor of food nutrition and public policy at Cornell University, New York.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1



comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
But what about the most important element; water? While the Himalayan glaciers may not be melting quite as fast as some predicted, with the proviso 'if', they are melting fast. Then at some point rivers become dry or turn into creeks, but at least 2 billion people today rely on the rivers for water. Not mentioned is climate change and its influence on droughts and more (but destructive) rain fall. I think that philosopher Thomas Malthus may have been more visionary than given credit for. Perhaps he knew why we could not possible produce enough food.
Posted by David Klein, 8/06/2010 12:48:40 PM
The main problem as far as I am concerned is the population explosion in a number of ‘third world’ countries. For as long as countries like India, China, most Muslim countries, where multiple wives and children are the norm, as well as those predominately catholic countries where birth control is still rigidly enforced by the Church, we have no hope. But it won’t impact on my generation, but heaven help the next few after mine.
Posted by Lara, 8/06/2010 5:07:31 PM
If all the agricultural resources in the developed world were steered towards crop productions to feed people instead of rearing animals to feed people, there would be enough food for everyone. Our obsession with eating meat is our biggest downfall, environmentally, physically, and spiritually. One of our societies biggest myths is that we need meat and animal products to thrive and survive.
Posted by June, 8/06/2010 11:55:40 PM
zimbabwe use to be the breadbasket of Africa until dictatorship came in. the problem is politicians are forcing the cotinuation of food shortage
Posted by dude, 9/06/2010 1:46:58 PM
Education in general and education on food production in all third world countries would help the people of these countries tremendously. Many countries around the equator do not have free education, the people don't have employment to be able to afford to send their children to school yet the leaders of these countries live in luxury where the crooks get richer and the poor get poorer
Posted by jimbob, 9/06/2010 1:59:02 PM
I think if all unused land will turn into the agriculture land then everybody in this world will have three times meal in a day.

In this case, people and government have to encourage themselves and their people as well.

By the way you come up with very good topic

Posted by accommodation jindabyne, 25/01/2011 10:21:48 AM
National Comment
Here is the place for you to vent on any national or world news and lifestyle stories on the YourGuide websites. If there is anything you see or hear that you like or don't like, tell us. Don't keep it to yourself!

Most popular articles




Harden-Murrumburrah Express







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...